![]() ![]() Once the conversation period was over and they had completed their post-conversation questionnaires, participants had the opportunity to seek out their partners in the room. This culminated in a total question period of 55 minutes, instead of the original 45 minutes. Since it was taking people considerably longer to type out their responses than if they were to exchange them verbally, we decided to provide participants an extra 10 minutes to complete the third and final set of questions. As the participants chatted, we looked around at their faces: many of them with brows furrowed in concentration and many of them smiling.ĭuring a bathroom break in the middle of the study, some of the participants complained that 15 minutes was not enough time to respond to the questions in as much detail as they would like. We set the timer for the first 15 minutes and the room immediately filled with the sound of fingers clacking on keyboards. If you would like a drink refill or more food, please put raise your hand and we can get it for you, so as not to alert your partner of who you are.” After that, you will be given 10 minutes to individually complete a post-conversation questionnaire reflecting on your experience. Please refrain from looking around at other participants to figure out who your partner is–we want to keep it anonymous until the end of the conversation period.Īt the end of the conversation period, you will have the option of exchanging contact information with your partner over text chat. Your conversation will be conducted entirely through text chat, with no physical interaction. Over 45 minutes, you and the person we have paired you with will talk about a series of particular topics designed to help you get close. Once the conversation period begins you may exchange names with your partner. The purpose of this exercise is to form a sense of intimacy between you and your partner at an accelerated pace. (We have matched you, based on the questionnaire you completed prior to arriving here, with someone we think will like you and whom you will like). “You will be paired with another person in this room whom you don’t know. We gave the participants the following instructions (adapted from the instructions provided in the original study): The participants then logged into the Slack accounts we set up for them and entered their assigned channel where they would communicate in private with their partner. We then instructed them to take a seat at an empty work station and refrain from talking to the other participants. When the participants arrived, we pointed them to a boardroom where the WiFi connection information and refreshments were set up. Step 3: The participants meet their matches through text We then sent the participants an email instructing them to come to our office on a Wednesday evening for around two hours to participate in the study. None of the participants had any idea who they had been paired up with. Once we had gathered all of their responses, we did our best to match the participants with a partner with whom they shared similar attitudes and values. ![]() We sent them a preliminary questionnaire asking for their name, age, gender, sexual orientation, religion, and profession, as well as a number of attitudinal questions like whether or not they drink or smoke, their level of spontaneity, etc. We assembled a group of 32 participants ranging from 21-34 years of age. Hover over the phone screen to scroll through the data. So we matched people up entirely based on personality. Would the same study work if conducted entirely through text communication, without any physical or verbal cues? We wanted to test the study but with a 21st century twist: can people fall in love through text message?Īfter all, most dating services involve a period of text communication between matched partners before they meet in person.īut we wanted to take it a step further: what if participants didn’t even know what their partner looked like?Īccording to the research done by Christian Rudder, author of Dataclysm, “photos drive 90% of the action in online dating.” Arthur Aron titled “The Experimental Generation of Interpersonal Closeness: A Procedure and Some Preliminary Findings.” The purpose of the study was to achieve an accelerated sense of intimacy between strangers in only 45 minutes. The NYT article actually pulled the questions from a 1997 study led by Dr. The idea was that if you sat down with a perfect stranger and exchanged these 36 questions, you would have shared enough intimate information with them to create a feeling of closeness in just one conversation. 37: Big Wedding Or Small?” The article presented a quiz comprised of 36 questions that supposedly lead to love–or, at least, an accelerated feeling of intimacy between strangers. The New York Times published an article titled “No. If there was a way to hack love, would you try it? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |